Maria couldn’t sleep that night. Every time her phone buzzed, her heart raced a little faster. The order of protection was supposed to keep her safe, supposed to give her peace of mind. But somehow, the messages kept coming through—texts, calls, even video messages that made her feel like nowhere was truly safe.
She wasn’t alone in this struggle. Across New York State, thousands of people rely on orders of protection to shield them from harassment, threats, or unwanted contact. When someone violates these court orders, especially from behind bars, it sends a chilling message that even the legal system’s strongest protections might not be enough.
This exact scenario played out recently in Yates County, where a jail inmate now faces serious additional charges for allegedly violating a court-ordered protection order while incarcerated.
When Jail Walls Aren’t Barriers Enough
Christopher Castle, a 32-year-old Penn Yan resident currently housed at the Yates County Jail, discovered that being behind bars doesn’t automatically prevent someone from breaking the law. On February 10, deputies arrested Castle on additional charges while he was already serving time at the facility.
The Yates jail inmate now faces criminal contempt in the second degree after correctional officers intercepted multiple forms of unauthorized communication with a protected party. According to the Yates County Sheriff’s Office, Castle had been sending text messages, making phone calls, and even conducting video calls with someone he was legally prohibited from contacting.
“Most people assume that being in jail automatically stops this kind of behavior,” explains criminal justice expert Dr. Sarah Mitchell. “But with smartphones, contraband communication devices, and even legitimate jail phone systems, determined individuals can still find ways to reach their victims.”
The case highlights a growing concern in correctional facilities nationwide: How do you prevent inmates from violating protection orders when technology makes communication easier than ever before?
Breaking Down the Legal Details
Criminal contempt in the second degree isn’t just a slap on the wrist. This charge carries serious consequences that could significantly extend Castle’s time behind bars and complicate his legal situation.
| Charge Details | Information |
|---|---|
| Primary Charge | Criminal Contempt in the Second Degree |
| Date of Arrest | February 10, 2026, 7:38 PM |
| Location | Yates County Jail |
| Investigating Deputy | Deputy Green |
| Evidence Type | Intercepted communications (texts, calls, video calls) |
| Current Status | Appearance ticket issued, court date pending |
The investigation process reveals how seriously correctional facilities take protection order violations:
- Correctional officers actively monitor inmate communications
- Multiple forms of contact were intercepted and documented
- Evidence was immediately turned over to investigative deputies
- A thorough investigation was conducted before filing charges
- The case was handled by specialized law enforcement personnel
“When we see patterns of communication with protected parties, we take immediate action,” says former corrections officer James Rodriguez. “These violations often escalate, and our job is to stop them before someone gets hurt.”
The Ripple Effect on Victims and Communities
For victims of domestic violence or harassment, learning that their abuser has violated a protection order from jail can be devastating. The psychological impact extends far beyond the immediate legal implications.
Protection orders are meant to provide a sense of security and legal backing for victims trying to rebuild their lives. When someone violates these orders—especially from jail—it sends a message that the legal system’s protections might not be as strong as victims hoped.
Local advocacy groups in the Finger Lakes region report that protection order violations often lead to:
- Increased anxiety and fear among victims
- Reluctance to report future incidents
- Loss of faith in the legal system’s ability to protect
- Additional costs for enhanced security measures
- Disruption of healing and recovery processes
“Every violation chips away at a victim’s sense of safety,” explains domestic violence counselor Rebecca Thompson. “When it happens from jail, victims often feel like there’s nowhere their abuser can’t reach them.”
The Yates County case also demonstrates how correctional facilities are adapting their monitoring systems to catch these violations. Modern jail communication systems often record calls and monitor digital communications, creating evidence trails that can support additional criminal charges.
Technology’s Double-Edged Role
The same technology that enables these violations also helps catch them. Yates County correctional officers were able to intercept Castle’s communications because modern jail systems typically monitor and record inmate communications for security purposes.
However, the case raises questions about how inmates gain access to unauthorized communication methods. While legitimate jail phone systems are monitored, contraband cell phones remain a persistent problem in correctional facilities nationwide.
“We’re constantly working to stay ahead of new communication technologies,” notes corrections technology specialist Mark Stevens. “Every time we solve one problem, inmates find creative new ways to circumvent our security measures.”
The investigation in Castle’s case appears thorough and well-documented, which strengthens the prosecution’s position. Deputy Green’s handling of the case suggests that Yates County takes these violations seriously and has procedures in place to build strong legal cases against violators.
For Castle, the additional charge means facing potential extended jail time and more complex legal proceedings. Criminal contempt charges can carry significant penalties, especially when they involve repeated violations of court orders.
The broader community impact extends beyond individual victims. Protection order violations erode public confidence in the legal system and can discourage other victims from seeking help through proper legal channels.
Moving forward, this case will likely serve as both a warning to other potential violators and a test of how effectively the legal system can protect victims even when perpetrators are already incarcerated.
FAQs
What is criminal contempt in the second degree?
Criminal contempt in the second degree is a class A misdemeanor in New York that involves willfully violating a court order, such as an order of protection.
How do jails monitor inmate communications?
Most jails record phone calls, monitor video visits, and may inspect written communications to ensure compliance with court orders and facility security.
Can someone be charged with additional crimes while already in jail?
Yes, inmates can face new criminal charges for crimes committed while incarcerated, including violations of protection orders or other illegal activities.
What happens when someone violates a protection order from jail?
Violations typically result in additional criminal charges, extended jail time, and potentially stricter communication restrictions during incarceration.
How can victims report protection order violations?
Victims should immediately contact local law enforcement or the sheriff’s department to report any violations, whether the perpetrator is in jail or not.
What penalties does criminal contempt carry in New York?
Criminal contempt in the second degree can result in up to one year in jail, fines, and other legal consequences depending on the specific circumstances.
About the Author
