When Sarah walked out of the movie theater last Friday night, she felt like she’d been through an emotional hurricane. She’d just watched Emerald Fennell’s new adaptation of “Wuthering Heights,” and honestly? She wasn’t sure if she loved it or hated it. As a lifelong fan of Emily Brontë’s novel, she’d been dreading this moment for months.
The controversy had been building since the first trailer dropped. Literary purists were up in arms about the changes. Book clubs were splitting down the middle. Her own sister had sworn she wouldn’t even give it a chance. But now, sitting in her car in the parking lot, Sarah found herself texting her friend: “It’s… actually kind of brilliant?”
She wasn’t alone in feeling conflicted. The Wuthering Heights Rotten Tomatoes audience score had just debuted, and the results were as surprising as they were telling about how audiences really feel when beloved literature gets the Hollywood treatment.
The Numbers Tell a Different Story Than Expected
Despite months of intense backlash and heated online debates, the Wuthering Heights Rotten Tomatoes audience score landed at a respectable 73%. This came as a shock to many industry watchers who predicted the film would struggle with general audiences after the literary community’s vocal disapproval.
The disconnect between pre-release criticism and actual viewer response highlights something fascinating about how people consume adaptations. While book lovers were posting lengthy Twitter threads about character assassination and plot butchery, regular moviegoers were apparently having a very different experience.
“Most people going to see this movie haven’t read the book in years, if at all,” explains film industry analyst Maria Rodriguez. “They’re judging it as a movie, not as a faithful adaptation. That’s a completely different set of expectations.”
The controversy centered around several key changes Fennell made to Brontë’s source material. Critics argued that the modernized dialogue, altered character motivations, and streamlined plot betrayed the novel’s gothic essence. However, the audience score suggests these concerns didn’t translate to widespread viewer dissatisfaction.
Breaking Down the Reception Numbers
The data reveals some interesting patterns in how different groups responded to the film:
| Audience Segment | Rating | Key Feedback |
|---|---|---|
| General Audiences (18-34) | 78% | Praised performances, visuals |
| Book Readers | 61% | Mixed on changes, loved cinematography |
| Over 50 Viewers | 69% | Appreciated emotional depth |
| Film Students/Critics | 82% | Recognized directorial vision |
What’s particularly striking is how film students and aspiring critics rated the movie higher than almost any other group. This suggests that when viewed through a purely cinematic lens, divorced from literary loyalty, the film succeeds on its own merits.
The most common positive feedback focused on several key areas:
- Margot Robbie and Jacob Elordi’s intense on-screen chemistry
- Stunning Yorkshire countryside cinematography
- Fennell’s bold directorial choices and visual storytelling
- Modernized dialogue that made characters more accessible
- Emotional impact that resonated with contemporary audiences
Meanwhile, the criticisms that did surface in audience reviews were surprisingly specific rather than broad condemnations. Many viewers acknowledged the changes while still finding value in the adaptation’s approach.
Why Literary Adaptations Always Spark Fierce Debates
The Wuthering Heights controversy touches on a broader cultural tension that emerges whenever beloved books get the Hollywood treatment. Readers form deep, personal connections with literary works that go far beyond plot and character.
“When you read a book, you’re collaborating with the author to create the world in your mind,” notes adaptation specialist Dr. Jennifer Mills. “A film adaptation essentially asks you to accept someone else’s interpretation of that world you’ve already built.”
This explains why the pre-release criticism was so intense. Book lovers weren’t just critiquing a movie; they felt like their personal interpretation of a beloved story was being challenged or invalidated.
However, the audience score suggests that once people actually watched the film, many were able to separate it from their literary expectations. The movie worked as its own artistic statement, even if it wasn’t the adaptation purists wanted.
The success metrics also reveal changing audience preferences. Younger viewers, in particular, seem more open to bold reinterpretations of classic material. They’re less concerned with faithful adaptation and more interested in whether a film tells a compelling story using contemporary filmmaking techniques.
Industry insiders are taking note of these patterns. “The Wuthering Heights numbers show that audiences are hungry for emotionally complex stories, even if they come with controversial creative choices,” observes box office analyst Tom Chen. “Directors shouldn’t be afraid to take risks with classic material.”
What This Means for Future Literary adaptations
The surprising audience reception of Wuthering Heights could signal a shift in how studios approach adapting literary classics. Rather than playing it safe with faithful recreations, filmmakers might feel emboldened to take more creative liberties.
This trend reflects broader changes in how audiences consume media. With streaming platforms offering endless options, movies need to distinguish themselves. A by-the-numbers adaptation might not cut through the noise the way a bold reinterpretation can.
The film’s commercial performance will ultimately determine its industry impact, but the positive audience response despite controversy suggests there’s appetite for innovative approaches to classic stories.
For book lovers, this might mean adjusting expectations about future adaptations. Rather than hoping for perfect faithful recreations, perhaps it’s worth approaching them as separate artistic works inspired by beloved source material.
The Wuthering Heights Rotten Tomatoes score also highlights the importance of actually watching films before judging them. Social media outrage and early criticism don’t always predict how general audiences will respond once they experience the work firsthand.
Moving forward, the success of Fennell’s adaptation might encourage other directors to pursue similarly bold visions. Classic literature offers rich material for reinterpretation, and audiences seem more open to creative risks than industry conventional wisdom suggested.
FAQs
What is the Wuthering Heights Rotten Tomatoes audience score?
The audience score debuted at 73%, which was higher than many industry experts predicted given the pre-release controversy.
Why were people upset about the Wuthering Heights adaptation?
Literary purists criticized changes to character development, modernized dialogue, and plot alterations they felt betrayed Emily Brontë’s original novel.
How did different age groups rate the movie?
Younger audiences (18-34) gave it 78%, while viewers over 50 rated it 69%, suggesting generational differences in adaptation expectations.
Who stars in the 2026 Wuthering Heights adaptation?
Margot Robbie plays Catherine Earnshaw and Jacob Elordi portrays Heathcliff, with Emerald Fennell directing.
Will the positive audience score affect future literary adaptations?
The strong reception despite controversy may encourage directors to take more creative risks with classic source material.
Did book readers rate the movie differently than general audiences?
Yes, readers who were familiar with the novel gave it 61% while general audiences rated it 78%, showing the impact of adaptation expectations.
About the Author
