Amid an intensifying national conversation about the affordability of higher education and the burden of student debt, Shadow Chancellor Rachel Reeves has ignited fierce debate over her remarks calling student loans “fair.” In a political climate increasingly concerned with cost-of-living crises and intergenerational inequality, Reeves’ comments drew sharp criticism from many recent graduates and advocacy groups who argue the current system is anything but equitable.
With student debt in the UK surpassing a staggering £200 billion and the average university graduate paying back their loan for decades—with some never clearing the full balance before the loan is written off—the disconnect between official opinions and public sentiment on this topic has rarely been so stark. At the heart of this divide lies deep frustration from a generation of students who feel entangled in an unsustainable financial model, while politicians continue to support the existing repayment structures.
Student loans in the UK: Current system at a glance
| Loan Type | Income-contingent repayment (Plan 2 and Plan 5 for England) |
| Average Graduate Debt (England) | £45,000 – £50,000 |
| Repayment Threshold (Plan 2) | £27,295 annually |
| Interest Rate | RPI + up to 3% |
| Loan Write-off Period | 30 years (Plan 2); 40 years (Plan 5) |
| Average Time to Repay in Full | Many do not repay in full before write-off |
| Government Policy Shift (2023-24) | Plan 5 system introduced with longer repayment term and different thresholds |
Rachel Reeves’ stance on student loan fairness
Speaking at a public appearance earlier this year, Rachel Reeves doubled down on Labour’s longstanding policy of supporting income-contingent student loans, stating that they represent a “fair” way of funding higher education. She argued that students benefit from obtaining degrees and that repayments linked to income ensure affordability throughout a graduate’s life. Reeves emphasized that only those earning above the threshold would repay, suggesting it reflects a progressive, balanced approach.
However, **many student groups and recent graduates** disagree. In online surveys, a majority have indicated that they feel burdened and financially restrained due to their student debt. Critics point to spiraling interest rates and changes in repayment terms that increasingly tie graduates into repayments for most of their working lives. These critics argue that fairness must be judged not just by the payment mechanism but by the cumulative debt, interest accrual, and psychological toll of decades-long financial obligations.
Public reaction: Graduates speak out
The backlash to Reeves’ comments was swift. Social media channels and university forums lit up with responses from young professionals and students who described the student loan system as “punitive” and “exploitative.” Many voiced concerns that while student debt may not show up as a traditional loan on credit reports, the compulsory deductions from paychecks feel no less financially draining.
Graduates also highlighted the disparity between today’s tuition fees—currently capped at £9,250 per year in England—and those from previous generations, including many current policymakers, who either paid significantly less or nothing at all. The contrast fuels growing resentment across an economic generation already struggling with housing costs, inflation, and stagnant wages.
“The idea that our system is fair seems detached from the lived experience of most students. It feels like we’re being punished for trying to educate ourselves.”
— Emily Carter, Recent University of Bristol GraduateAlso Read
Social Security checks may rise in 2026, but some retirees could still feel squeezed
Who benefits from the current system
| Group | Impact |
|---|---|
| Low-income graduates | Pay less or nothing if income stays below threshold |
| High-earning graduates | Repay full loan quickly, but with added interest |
| Government | Receives partial repayments, offsets higher education costs onto individuals |
| Taxpayers | Still shoulder part of unpaid loan through government subsidy |
| Students under Plan 5 | Longer repayment period likely means higher total repayment over time |
How repayment plans affect long-term wealth
One of the most persistent criticisms of the UK’s student loan system is its impact on long-term wealth accumulation. Since repayments begin once a graduate makes over a set threshold and continue for decades thereafter, they can reduce disposable income throughout a person’s prime earning years. This burden can delay key milestones such as buying a home, saving for retirement, or starting a family.
Under the new Plan 5 scheme introduced for English students starting in 2023, repayment thresholds have been lowered to £25,000, and the loan write-off period increased from 30 to 40 years. Many financial advisors warn that these changes could mean a **larger proportion of graduates repaying more over a longer time**, increasing the overall cost of education compared to previous plans.
“Extending the repayment period doesn’t reduce debt—it stretches it thinly across a lifetime. That doesn’t feel like fairness to most borrowers.”
— Dr. Alan Webster, Higher Education Policy Analyst
The fairness debate: Income-contingent or intergenerational inequity?
Defenders of the current system highlight its progressive nature, where those who earn more contribute more toward the cost of their education, and those with lower income are protected. Yet, this structure does not address concerns around high fees, interest rates, and the psychological weight of knowing one carries tens of thousands in debt for most of adulthood.
Critics argue that **older generations benefited from free or affordable education**, while today’s students are saddled with dramatically higher debt burdens under the guise of choice. The average student in England now graduates with nearly £50,000 in debt, and very few are expected to fully repay their loans before reaching the write-off point.
What political parties are saying
While Labour maintains that income-contingent loans are a fair compromise, some voices within the party and affiliated organizations have begun discussing alternative funding models. These include a return to maintenance grants, a graduate tax, or a completely overhauled tuition-free model funded through progressive taxation.
The Conservative government continues to support the current structure, with tweaks such as the Plan 5 introduction aimed at increasing fiscal sustainability. However, public discontent could shape manifestos ahead of the upcoming general election, particularly as student finance becomes a wedge issue with younger voters.
Growing support for reform and alternatives
As dissatisfaction rises, so too does interest in policy alternatives. Advocacy groups and student unions are campaigning for either a significant reduction in tuition fees or a complete overhaul of the loan system itself. Some experts propose shifting to a graduate tax system, which would simplify repayment and arguably be more transparent and equitable than the current plan-based stratification.
“Without bold reform, we risk entrenching inequality. Student finance must evolve to reflect economic reality.”
— Priya Desai, Policy Director, UK Institute for Higher Education
Short FAQs: What you need to know
What is Plan 5 for student loans in the UK?
Plan 5 is the latest student loan system for new students in England from 2023, featuring a lower repayment threshold (£25,000) and a 40-year write-off period.
How much debt does the average graduate carry?
The average graduate in England now carries debt between £45,000 and £50,000 due to tuition and maintenance loans.
Do most graduates repay their student loan in full?
No. Under current forecasts, the majority of graduates will not fully repay their loans before they are written off.
Is the student loan interest rate capped?
The interest rate is income-contingent and typically ranges from the Retail Price Index (RPI) to RPI +3% depending on earnings.
Does student debt affect credit ratings?
No. Student loan debt does not appear on credit reports and does not directly impact your credit score.
What happens if I move abroad?
You still need to repay your student loan, and repayment thresholds will be adjusted based on local living standards.
Can the current system be changed?
Yes, but only through political will and legislation. Upcoming elections and public pressure may drive reforms.
Why is the student loan system under criticism now?
Due to rising debt levels, long repayment terms, and intergenerational inequities, many feel the system is out of step with economic realities, especially for younger workers.
About the Author
