Sarah Martinez thought she was making healthy choices for her family. She bought non-stick cookware to reduce oil in her cooking, chose stain-resistant carpeting for her kids’ playroom, and even switched to dental floss that glided smoothly between her teeth. What she didn’t know was that all these everyday products contained the same family of chemicals now linked to serious health problems.
Like millions of New Yorkers, Sarah had unknowingly filled her home with PFAS—forever chemicals that don’t break down naturally and accumulate in our bodies over time. Today, she’s watching closely as New York lawmakers push forward with groundbreaking legislation that could finally start removing these toxic substances from the products we use every day.
The fight over PFAS regulation in New York isn’t just about policy—it’s about protecting families from chemicals that major corporations knew were dangerous but kept secret for decades.
New York Takes Bold Steps Against Forever Chemicals
New York State lawmakers are making unprecedented progress on PFAS regulation, advancing multiple bills that could reshape how these persistent chemicals are used in consumer products. The legislative push comes as mounting evidence shows these “forever chemicals” pose serious health risks to millions of residents.
The current legislative package includes sweeping measures that would ban PFAS from beauty products, dental floss, and numerous household items. Additionally, lawmakers are considering a crucial moratorium on using biosolids as farm fertilizer—a practice that has spread PFAS contamination across agricultural lands.
“The manufacturers of these chemicals, DuPont and 3M, they knew for a very long time that these were dangerous, toxic chemicals, but never reported it and kept it secret,” explains Kate Donovan, northeast regional director for environmental health at the Natural Resources Defense Council. “So, it allowed these chemicals to continue to be produced for decades and to be put into the marketplace without a lot of knowledge about its health concerns.”
While the State Senate has already passed two significant PFAS bills this month, getting them through the Assembly remains challenging. The opposition comes primarily from industries that have built their business models around these chemicals, particularly non-stick cookware manufacturers who insist their Teflon products are safe despite growing evidence to the contrary.
The Hidden Costs of Chemical Contamination
The financial impact of PFAS contamination on New York is staggering. Conservative estimates suggest the state will spend between $2.7 and $4.4 billion on healthcare costs related to PFAS exposure. This massive expense comes at a time when state budgets are already stretched thin.
The contamination crisis runs deeper than most people realize. Current data shows that half of all New York’s water systems contain detectable levels of PFAS, with more than 250 local waterways exceeding state-regulated levels of these forever chemicals.
| PFAS Impact Category | New York Statistics |
|---|---|
| Water Systems Affected | 50% of all state systems |
| Waterways Above Safe Levels | More than 250 locations |
| Projected Healthcare Costs | $2.7-$4.4 billion |
| Products Currently Regulated | Clothing, firefighting foam, food packaging |
These numbers represent real families dealing with real health consequences. The health impacts of PFAS exposure range from increased cancer risks to developmental problems in children. For parents like Sarah, these statistics aren’t just data points—they’re reasons to demand immediate action.
What These Bills Mean for Everyday New Yorkers
The proposed PFAS regulation could transform how New Yorkers shop and live. If passed, the legislation would remove these toxic chemicals from products that millions of people use daily:
- Beauty products including makeup, skincare items, and hair care products
- Dental floss and other oral care products
- Household cleaning supplies
- Food containers and packaging materials
- Textiles and clothing items
New York has already taken significant steps in recent years, banning PFAS from clothing, firefighting foam, and food packaging. However, the current legislative package would expand these protections to cover many more consumer products that families encounter regularly.
Some companies aren’t waiting for regulation to act. Several major brands have begun voluntarily removing PFAS from their products as consumer awareness grows and scientific evidence mounts about the health risks.
“These chemicals became common because, despite their health impacts, they were sold as a consumer convenience,” Donovan notes. The promise of stain-resistant, waterproof, and non-stick properties made PFAS attractive to manufacturers and consumers alike, but at a hidden cost that’s only now becoming clear.
The regulatory battle isn’t just about removing chemicals from products—it’s about creating transparency in manufacturing and giving consumers the information they need to make informed choices about their health.
Fighting Industry Pushback and Political Challenges
The path to comprehensive PFAS regulation faces significant obstacles. Industry groups, particularly those representing non-stick cookware manufacturers, argue that their products are safe and that regulation would harm consumers and jobs. They claim that newer formulations of Teflon don’t pose the same risks as earlier versions.
However, environmental health experts point to mounting scientific evidence that contradicts industry claims. Studies continue to show links between PFAS exposure and serious health problems, including certain cancers, liver damage, and immune system disruption.
The political challenge lies in moving legislation through both chambers of the state legislature. While the Senate has shown strong support for PFAS regulation, the Assembly faces pressure from various industry groups and must balance environmental health concerns with economic considerations.
Advocates emphasize that the long-term costs of inaction far outweigh short-term economic disruptions. “A conservative estimate was between $2.7 and $4.4 billion dollars the state is expected to spend on health care related to PFAS contamination,” Donovan explains, highlighting how prevention could save taxpayers billions.
The Broader Environmental Justice Picture
PFAS contamination doesn’t affect all communities equally. Low-income neighborhoods and communities of color often bear a disproportionate burden of chemical exposure due to their proximity to industrial facilities and contaminated sites.
The biosolids moratorium being considered by lawmakers addresses one significant pathway for PFAS contamination. When sewage sludge containing forever chemicals is spread on farmland as fertilizer, it can contaminate soil and water for generations. This practice has affected agricultural communities across New York, particularly those in rural areas with limited political power.
For many families, PFAS exposure isn’t a choice—it’s an unavoidable result of where they live, work, or go to school. The proposed regulations would help level the playing field by removing these chemicals from consumer products regardless of where people shop or what they can afford.
FAQs
What are PFAS chemicals and why are they called “forever chemicals”?
PFAS are synthetic chemicals that don’t break down naturally in the environment or human body, earning them the nickname “forever chemicals” because they persist indefinitely.
How do PFAS chemicals get into drinking water?
PFAS enter water systems through industrial discharge, landfill runoff, firefighting foam use, and the application of contaminated biosolids to farmland.
What health problems are linked to PFAS exposure?
Studies connect PFAS to increased cancer risk, liver damage, immune system problems, and developmental issues in children.
Which products currently contain PFAS in New York?
PFAS can be found in non-stick cookware, beauty products, dental floss, stain-resistant fabrics, and many household items, though some categories are already banned in the state.
When might these new PFAS regulations take effect?
The timeline depends on legislative approval, but advocates hope some measures could be implemented within the next year if bills pass both chambers.
Can I test my home’s water for PFAS contamination?
Yes, several laboratories offer PFAS testing for drinking water, though costs vary and some tests may require professional sampling.
About the Author
