Maria used to love making Sunday breakfast for her family. Every week, she’d pull out her trusty can of Pam cooking spray, give the pan a quick spritz, and watch her pancakes cook to golden perfection without sticking. She never thought twice about the light mist that would float up from the heated pan.
But for one Los Angeles man, that familiar kitchen routine led to a life-changing diagnosis. His story has now resulted in a landmark $25 million verdict that could reshape how we think about everyday cooking products.
The case highlights a sobering reality many home cooks never consider: the products we use daily in our kitchens might carry hidden health risks we’re never told about.
The Verdict That’s Shaking Up Kitchen Safety
A Los Angeles jury has ordered Conagra, the food giant behind Pam cooking spray, to pay $25 million to a man who developed a rare chronic lung disease allegedly caused by inhaling fumes from butter-flavored Pam cooking spray. The Pam cooking spray lawsuit centers on diacetyl, a chemical compound used to create buttery flavor that’s been linked to serious respiratory problems.
The Superior Court of Los Angeles jury found that Conagra failed to adequately warn consumers about the potential dangers of breathing in fumes from their product. This verdict could set a significant precedent for similar cases involving household cooking products.
“This case sends a clear message that companies can’t hide behind the assumption that their products are safe just because they’re common,” said food safety attorney Michael Chen, who wasn’t involved in the case. “Consumers have a right to know about potential health risks.”
The plaintiff now faces the devastating prospect of needing a double lung transplant due to his condition. His lawyers argued that regular use of the cooking spray in his kitchen led to the development of this severe respiratory illness.
What You Need to Know About the Health Risks
Diacetyl has been a controversial ingredient for years, particularly after studies linked it to “popcorn lung” in factory workers. Here’s what makes this Pam cooking spray lawsuit particularly significant:
- Diacetyl was used in butter-flavored Pam products to enhance taste
- When heated, the chemical can release potentially harmful fumes
- Prolonged exposure may lead to serious respiratory conditions
- Conagra removed diacetyl from Pam formulations in 2009
- Many consumers were unaware of potential inhalation risks
During the trial, Conagra acknowledged removing diacetyl from its Pam cooking spray formula over a decade ago. However, the jury determined that the company should have done more to warn consumers about the risks before making this change.
“The removal of diacetyl in 2009 suggests the company recognized there were safety concerns,” explained Dr. Sarah Rodriguez, a pulmonologist specializing in occupational lung diseases. “The question becomes: why weren’t consumers warned earlier?”
| Key Timeline | Event |
|---|---|
| Pre-2009 | Pam butter-flavored spray contained diacetyl |
| 2009 | Conagra removed diacetyl from Pam formulations |
| Recent | Lawsuit filed alleging inadequate warnings |
| 2024 | $25 million verdict awarded to plaintiff |
The chemical diacetyl naturally occurs in fermented products and gives them a buttery taste. Food manufacturers have used synthetic versions to enhance flavor in everything from microwave popcorn to baked goods. However, studies have shown that when heated and inhaled, diacetyl can cause scarring in the small airways of the lungs.
How This Affects Your Kitchen and Your Family
This Pam cooking spray lawsuit raises important questions for millions of families who use aerosol cooking sprays regularly. The verdict doesn’t just impact Conagra – it could influence how all food manufacturers approach product safety warnings and consumer education.
Home cooks should be aware that proper ventilation becomes especially crucial when using any aerosol cooking products. Opening windows, using exhaust fans, and avoiding direct inhalation of cooking spray mists are simple steps that can reduce potential exposure.
“I always tell my patients that good kitchen ventilation isn’t just about odors – it’s about health,” said Dr. Rodriguez. “When you’re cooking with any aerosol products, make sure you have adequate airflow.”
The financial impact of this case extends beyond the $25 million award. Legal experts suggest this verdict could encourage more lawsuits against food manufacturers who may not have adequately warned consumers about potential health risks from common household products.
Consumer advocacy groups are calling for stricter labeling requirements and more comprehensive safety testing for cooking products. They argue that everyday items found in most kitchens deserve the same scrutiny as specialized industrial products.
“Families shouldn’t have to become chemists to safely use basic cooking products,” said consumer rights advocate Jennifer Walsh. “Clear, honest labeling about potential risks should be the standard, not the exception.”
For consumers currently using cooking sprays, experts recommend reading labels carefully and staying informed about ingredient changes. While current formulations of Pam no longer contain diacetyl, other brands and products may still use different chemicals that could pose health risks.
The case also highlights the importance of keeping up with product recalls and safety updates from manufacturers. Companies sometimes quietly reformulate products without prominently advertising the changes to consumers.
FAQs
Is Pam cooking spray still safe to use?
Current Pam formulations no longer contain diacetyl as of 2009, but users should ensure proper kitchen ventilation and avoid inhaling any cooking spray mists.
What is diacetyl and why is it dangerous?
Diacetyl is a chemical compound that creates buttery flavor but can cause serious lung scarring when heated and inhaled regularly over time.
How much money did the plaintiff receive in the lawsuit?
The Los Angeles jury awarded the plaintiff $25 million in damages for developing lung disease allegedly caused by Pam cooking spray.
Should I stop using aerosol cooking sprays?
While the specific ingredient in question was removed in 2009, using any aerosol cooking products with proper ventilation is recommended for safety.
Can I join a class-action lawsuit against Conagra?
Each case is unique, and potential plaintiffs should consult with qualified attorneys who specialize in product liability law to discuss their specific circumstances.
What symptoms should I watch for if I’ve used Pam cooking spray regularly?
Persistent cough, shortness of breath, or other respiratory symptoms warrant medical evaluation, though these can have many different causes.
About the Author
