When Maria Rodriguez heard about the missing elderly woman on the news last week, she immediately thought of her own 82-year-old mother living alone in Phoenix. “It could be any of our mothers,” she told her sister over the phone that night. The fear in her voice was unmistakable.
That elderly woman is Nancy Guthrie, the 84-year-old mother of beloved Today Show host Savannah Guthrie. What started as a missing person case has now become something far more complicated—and disturbing.
Now, just when answers seemed within reach, a bitter dispute between federal and local law enforcement threatens to derail the investigation entirely. The Nancy Guthrie disappearance has taken an unexpected turn that’s leaving everyone involved frustrated and the family still waiting for closure.
When Law Enforcement Can’t Agree on Evidence
The investigation into Nancy Guthrie’s disappearance hit a major roadblock when the FBI and Pima County Sheriff’s Department found themselves at odds over crucial evidence handling. According to Reuters, the heart of the conflict centers on where key physical evidence should be analyzed.
The FBI expected to receive critical evidence at their state-of-the-art crime lab in Quantico, Virginia. Instead, they discovered that the Pima County Sheriff’s Department had sent materials to a private DNA laboratory in Florida. This decision has created serious tension between the agencies when cooperation is most needed.
An unnamed law enforcement official expressed frustration with the situation, telling Reuters: “It risks further slowing a case that grows more urgent by the minute. It’s clear the fastest path to answers is leveraging federal resources and technology.”
The evidence in question includes a black glove found near Nancy’s Tucson home and DNA samples collected from inside her residence. These materials could hold the key to understanding what happened during those crucial hours when Nancy vanished.
Perhaps most concerning is the financial aspect of this decision. Sources indicate that approximately $200,000 has been spent sending evidence to the Florida laboratory, raising serious questions about whether resources are being used effectively in this urgent case.
The Sheriff Fires Back
Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos isn’t taking these accusations quietly. Speaking to NBC Tucson affiliate KVOA, Nanos categorically denied claims that his office is withholding evidence from federal investigators.
“Not even close to the truth,” Nanos said Thursday, his frustration evident.
The sheriff explained his reasoning for the laboratory choice, claiming the FBI initially wanted to test only a small portion of the evidence found at the scene. Nanos believed a more comprehensive approach was necessary.
“Actually, the FBI just wanted to send the one or two they found by the crime scene, closest to it, mile, mile and a half,” Nanos explained. “I said ‘No, why do that? Let’s just send them all to where all the DNA exist, all the profiles and the markers exist.’ They agreed, makes sense.”
Here’s what we know about the evidence dispute:
- Multiple gloves were found in the area around Nancy’s home
- The sheriff’s office wanted comprehensive testing of all evidence
- FBI preferred to focus on items closest to the crime scene
- The final decision sent all materials to a Florida lab
- Cost of private lab testing reached approximately $200,000
Nanos emphasized that investigators “don’t even know the true value of these gloves,” noting there were “quite a number of them.” His strategy appears focused on casting a wider net to potentially uncover more leads.
| Key Timeline | Event |
|---|---|
| January 31 | Nancy Guthrie last seen at her Tucson home |
| February 1 | Nancy declared missing, blood trail discovered |
| February 1 (early hours) | Surveillance shows suspect tampering with doorbell camera |
| This week | FBI Director releases surveillance footage |
| Present | Evidence dispute emerges between agencies |
What This Means for the Search
While law enforcement officials argue over evidence protocols, Nancy Guthrie remains missing. The 84-year-old was last seen on January 31st at her Tucson residence. By the next morning, a blood trail—later confirmed to be hers—was discovered outside her front door.
This discovery immediately elevated the case from a missing person investigation to a potential crime scene. The FBI quickly joined local authorities in the search, bringing federal resources to bear on what appeared to be a serious criminal matter.
The case gained additional urgency this week when FBI Director Kash Patel released chilling surveillance footage. The video shows a ski-mask-wearing individual tampering with Nancy’s doorbell camera in the early morning hours of February 1st.
Authorities describe the suspect as a man with an average build, standing approximately 5’9″ to 5’10” tall. He was wearing a distinctive black 25-liter Ozark Trail Hiker Pack backpack—details that could prove crucial for public identification.
The response from the community has been overwhelming. Authorities report receiving more than 13,000 tips from concerned citizens. The reward for information leading to Nancy’s whereabouts has grown to $100,000, reflecting the case’s high priority.
A former FBI investigator familiar with missing person cases explained the significance of the current dispute: “Every day that passes without answers is another day the trail grows cold. When agencies can’t work together seamlessly, it’s the victims and their families who suffer most.”
The Nancy Guthrie disappearance has captured national attention not just because of her daughter’s celebrity status, but because it represents every family’s worst nightmare. An elderly woman, living independently, suddenly vanishing from her own home with only a trail of blood as evidence.
Law enforcement sources acknowledge that Nancy’s age makes this case particularly urgent. In missing person cases involving elderly individuals, time is often the most critical factor in determining outcomes.
The surveillance footage released by Director Patel adds another troubling dimension to the case. The fact that someone specifically targeted Nancy’s security camera suggests premeditation and planning. This wasn’t a random crime of opportunity.
According to Patel, the doorbell camera footage “may have been lost, corrupted, or inaccessible due to a variety of factors, including the removal of recording devices.” This deliberate interference with evidence collection shows a level of sophistication that concerns investigators.
The investigation has mobilized resources across multiple agencies, with the FBI’s involvement bringing advanced forensic capabilities and national databases to the search. However, the current evidence handling dispute threatens to undermine this collaborative approach.
Community members in Tucson have rallied around the search efforts, with volunteer groups organizing to distribute flyers and search local areas. Nancy’s neighbors describe her as a quiet, independent woman who kept to herself but was always friendly when encountered.
The $100,000 reward reflects both the family’s desperation for answers and law enforcement’s recognition that public assistance may be crucial to solving the case. With over 13,000 tips already submitted, investigators are clearly hoping that someone in the community holds the key piece of information needed.
For Savannah Guthrie and her family, each day brings new anguish as they wait for news about Nancy’s fate. The public nature of the case adds additional pressure, with media attention both helping spread awareness and intensifying the family’s ordeal.
As the evidence dispute plays out behind the scenes, one unnamed federal official captured the frustration many feel: “Anything less only prolongs the Guthrie family’s grief and the community’s wait for justice.”
The coming days will likely determine whether federal and local authorities can resolve their differences and refocus on the central mission: finding Nancy Guthrie and bringing whoever is responsible to justice. Until then, an entire community continues to hold its breath, hoping for news that Nancy will be found safe.
FAQs
When did Nancy Guthrie disappear?
Nancy Guthrie was last seen on the night of January 31st and was officially declared missing the following day, February 1st.
What evidence was found at Nancy’s home?
Investigators discovered a blood trail outside her front door that was later confirmed to belong to Nancy, plus multiple gloves in the surrounding area.
Why are the FBI and sheriff’s department disagreeing?
The dispute centers on where evidence should be analyzed—the FBI wanted to use their Quantico lab, while the sheriff sent materials to a private Florida laboratory.
How much is the reward for information about Nancy?
The reward for information leading to Nancy’s whereabouts has increased to $100,000.
What did the surveillance footage show?
FBI-released footage shows a ski-mask-wearing suspect tampering with Nancy’s doorbell camera in the early morning hours of February 1st.
How many tips have authorities received?
Law enforcement has received more than 13,000 tips from the public regarding Nancy’s disappearance.
About the Author
