Maria clutched her phone tightly as she waited outside the Orange County courthouse, watching the news vans roll up one by one. Her husband had been detained three weeks ago during what started as a routine traffic stop. Now she was hearing rumors that ICE might be looking to build new facilities right here in her community.
“I never thought this would happen to us,” she whispered to her sister. “We’ve lived here for fifteen years. This is our home.”
Maria’s story isn’t unique. Across New York State, families are grappling with the reality that Immigration and Customs Enforcement is actively scouting new detention center locations, sparking fierce opposition from local communities and immigrant rights advocates.
New York Becomes ICE’s Latest Target for Expansion
The federal agency’s push to expand detention capacity in New York has set off alarm bells throughout the state. ICE detention center locations are being evaluated across multiple counties, with officials looking for facilities that can house hundreds of detained immigrants.
The most high-profile case emerged in Chester, a small town in Orange County, where ICE had its sights set on establishing a new facility. But local lawmakers weren’t having it. The Orange County Legislature delivered a unanimous rejection of the proposed detention center, sending a clear message that the community wouldn’t welcome such a facility.
“This was about more than just one town,” said County Legislator Katie Bonelli. “We’re talking about the kind of community we want to be.”
The rejection wasn’t just symbolic. It represented a growing trend of local governments pushing back against federal immigration enforcement expansion in their backyards.
The Financial Stakes Behind Detention Centers
Understanding why ICE is so determined to expand requires looking at the numbers. The detention business is lucrative, and the financial incentives are substantial for both the federal government and local partners.
| Year | Orange County ICE Revenue | Daily Rate Per Detainee | Average Daily Population |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | $9 million | $134 | 184 |
| 2019 | $8.2 million | $134 | 167 |
| 2020 | $6.1 million | $134 | 125 |
These figures tell a story that goes beyond simple immigration enforcement. Counties that partner with ICE see significant revenue streams, making detention centers attractive from a purely financial perspective.
But advocates argue this creates perverse incentives. “When counties profit from keeping people locked up, there’s less motivation to find alternatives to detention,” explained Rosa Santana, co-executive director of Envision Freedom Fund.
The key issues surrounding ICE’s expansion plans include:
- Community safety concerns about large-scale detention facilities
- Economic impacts on local neighborhoods and property values
- Strain on local emergency services and infrastructure
- Moral objections to profiting from immigrant detention
- Questions about oversight and accountability in private facilities
Legislative Battles Shape the Future
The fight over ICE detention center locations has moved from local town halls to the halls of the state capitol in Albany. The Dignity Not Detention Act represents the most comprehensive effort to limit ICE’s expansion in New York.
“This bill will prohibit any person or any entity in the State of New York from owning or operating an immigrant facility, such as counties that have a contract with ICE,” Santana explained. “It will also prohibit any entity from entering into a new contract or receiving payments from immigrant detention.”
The legislation has gained momentum among immigrant rights advocates who see it as a way to protect vulnerable communities. But it’s not the only bill in play. The New York for All Act would end agreements allowing local law enforcement to work with ICE, creating another layer of protection for immigrants.
State Senator Julia Salazar, who sponsors the Dignity Not Detention Act, emphasized the human cost. “We’re talking about families being separated, people being held in conditions that violate basic human dignity.”
Conditions Drive Opposition to New Facilities
Much of the backlash against new ICE detention center locations stems from documented problems at existing facilities. The detention center at 26 Federal Plaza in New York City became a flashpoint when Attorney General Letitia James brought charges against ICE for holding people in inhumane conditions.
The conditions that sparked legal action paint a troubling picture:
- People detained for days with inadequate food provision
- Lack of proper sleeping accommodations
- Limited access to legal representation
- Insufficient medical care for detainees
- Overcrowded holding areas
“It is agonizing hours and even days where people are being detained there for a day or two, just given a sandwich or not enough food,” Santana emphasized. “Sometimes there’s not even a place for them to sleep.”
These revelations have made communities more skeptical of hosting new facilities. Local officials worry that bringing ICE detention centers to their areas could mean importing the same problems that have plagued existing locations.
Communities Fight Back
The pushback against ICE expansion goes beyond legislative halls. Community organizations across New York have mobilized to oppose new detention facilities in their neighborhoods.
In Chester, residents packed town hall meetings to voice their opposition. Parents worried about having a detention facility near schools. Business owners feared the impact on local commerce. Religious leaders spoke about moral obligations to protect vulnerable populations.
“This isn’t about politics,” said Chester resident Tom McKenzie. “It’s about what kind of community we want our kids to grow up in.”
The opposition has been remarkably effective. Beyond Orange County’s rejection, other municipalities are preemptively passing resolutions to block ICE facilities before they’re even proposed.
Immigration attorney David Chen noted the broader implications. “When communities reject these facilities, it forces ICE to look elsewhere or reconsider whether detention is the right approach at all.”
FAQs
Why is ICE looking for new detention center locations in New York?
ICE claims it needs additional capacity to handle immigration enforcement operations in the region, though critics argue it’s part of expanded enforcement efforts.
Can local communities actually block ICE facilities?
Yes, local zoning laws and county legislation can effectively prevent ICE from establishing detention centers in specific areas.
How much money do counties make from ICE detention contracts?
Counties typically receive around $134 per day per detainee, which can add up to millions annually for facilities housing hundreds of people.
What is the Dignity Not Detention Act?
It’s proposed New York legislation that would prohibit any entity in the state from owning, operating, or contracting for immigrant detention facilities.
Are there alternatives to detention that ICE could use?
Yes, alternatives include ankle monitors, check-in programs, and community-based case management, which are typically less expensive than detention.
What happens to people currently detained if these bills pass?
Existing contracts would likely be phased out over time, and people would either be released with alternatives to detention or transferred to facilities in other states.
About the Author
