Maria Andersson still remembers the day her small Swedish hometown celebrated landing a new defense contract. The local Saab facility, once threatened with closure, suddenly buzzed with engineers working late into the night. “My neighbor went from worrying about layoffs to hiring more technicians,” she recalls. Across Europe, similar stories are playing out as defense companies ride an unprecedented wave of military spending.
What started as emergency procurement after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has evolved into the largest European rearmament effort since the Cold War. But not every defense company is sharing equally in this bonanza.
The Europe defense winners 2025 landscape reveals a stark divide between those capturing massive contracts and others struggling to keep pace. While governments pour billions into rebuilding their military capabilities, a select few companies are emerging as the clear beneficiaries of this historic spending surge.
Why Some Defense Giants Are Thriving While Others Stumble
European defense spending in 2025 reached levels that would have seemed impossible just three years ago. Countries that once viewed military procurement as a necessary evil now treat it as an urgent national priority.
The shift happened fast. Estonia doubled its defense budget. Poland signed contracts worth over $30 billion. Even traditionally neutral nations like Finland and Sweden dramatically increased their military investments.
“The money is flowing like never before, but it’s not going everywhere equally,” explains defense analyst Henrik Stålhane. “Companies that can deliver proven systems quickly are winning big, while those stuck in bureaucratic development programs are missing out.”
Sweden’s Saab exemplifies this trend perfectly. The company’s Gripen fighter jets, once considered a niche product, suddenly became attractive to nations wanting reliable aircraft without long delivery times. Their submarines and radar systems followed the same pattern – proven technology available when customers needed it most.
Germany’s Rheinmetall tells a similar success story. As European armies realized their ammunition stockpiles had been depleted helping Ukraine, Rheinmetall’s production lines couldn’t keep up with demand. The company’s share price more than doubled as orders flooded in for everything from tank shells to air defense systems.
The Winners and Losers Reshaping Europe’s Defense Industry
The Europe defense winners 2025 list reads like a who’s who of companies that prioritized practical solutions over ambitious mega-projects. Here’s how the major players performed:
| Company | Primary Success Areas | Major 2025 Contracts | Market Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| Saab (Sweden) | Fighter jets, submarines, radars | $8.2 billion in new orders | Rising star |
| Rheinmetall (Germany) | Ammunition, air defense, tanks | $12.1 billion order backlog | Market leader |
| BAE Systems (UK) | Naval systems, combat vehicles | $6.7 billion secured | Stable growth |
| FCAS Program (Multi-national) | Future fighter development | Multiple delays, funding disputes | Struggling |
The standout winners share common traits that explain their success:
- Mature, battle-tested products ready for immediate delivery
- Flexible manufacturing capabilities that can scale quickly
- Strong relationships with multiple European governments
- Focus on interoperability with NATO systems
- Competitive pricing compared to American alternatives
Meanwhile, ambitious multinational projects like the Future Combat Air System (FCAS) continue struggling with cost overruns and political disagreements. “FCAS represents everything wrong with European defense cooperation,” notes Brussels-based military expert Catherine Moreau. “Too many cooks in the kitchen, too many national interests to balance.”
The Franco-German-Spanish fighter program, meant to replace aging Eurofighter and Rafale jets by 2040, faced another major setback in late 2025 when Germany threatened to reduce its financial commitment. Spain’s new government also questioned whether the projected costs justified continued participation.
What This Means for European Security and Jobs
The reshuffling of Europe’s defense industry carries implications far beyond corporate balance sheets. Countries increasingly view domestic defense production as a strategic asset, not just an economic opportunity.
Poland’s decision to partner with South Korea for tank production, rather than wait for European alternatives, sent shockwaves through traditional suppliers. “We can’t afford to wait five years for a committee to approve a design,” explained Polish Defense Minister Władysław Kosiniak-Kamysz. “Our security needs are immediate.”
This urgency has created opportunities for agile companies while leaving traditional giants scrambling. France’s Naval Group, once dominant in European submarine sales, lost multiple contracts to German and Swedish competitors offering faster delivery times.
The job market reflects these shifts dramatically. Saab hired over 3,000 new employees in 2025, with many positions in high-tech engineering and manufacturing. Rheinmetall opened new production facilities across Germany and expanded into Eastern Europe.
“My engineering degree finally feels relevant again,” says Thomas Weber, a recent graduate who joined Rheinmetall’s Munich office. “There’s real purpose in this work now – we’re helping defend democracy.”
But the transformation isn’t uniform across Europe. Traditional defense centers in France and Italy face uncertainty as their flagship programs struggle. The ripple effects extend to thousands of suppliers and subcontractors who depend on these major programs.
Looking ahead, the Europe defense winners 2025 are likely to maintain their advantage as long as they can deliver results quickly and cost-effectively. The current geopolitical climate favors proven solutions over ambitious experiments, practical partnerships over complex multinational programs.
The question now is whether Europe’s defense industry can maintain this momentum while avoiding the boom-and-bust cycles that historically plague military procurement. For companies like Saab and Rheinmetall, the challenge will be sustaining growth without overextending their capabilities.
For European taxpayers and military personnel, the ultimate measure of success won’t be corporate profits but whether this unprecedented investment actually makes the continent more secure. Early indicators suggest that focusing on practical, deliverable solutions rather than paper promises might finally be paying dividends.
FAQs
Which companies were the biggest Europe defense winners in 2025?
Saab, Rheinmetall, and BAE Systems led the pack, securing billions in new contracts for proven military systems.
Why is the FCAS fighter program struggling?
The Future Combat Air System faces delays due to cost overruns, political disagreements between France, Germany, and Spain, and competing national interests.
How much did European defense spending increase in 2025?
European defense budgets reached Cold War-era levels, with some countries like Estonia doubling their military spending and Poland committing over $30 billion to new contracts.
What makes some defense companies more successful than others right now?
Winners typically offer mature, battle-tested products with quick delivery times, flexible manufacturing, and competitive pricing compared to American alternatives.
Are there job opportunities in Europe’s defense sector?
Yes, companies like Saab hired over 3,000 new employees in 2025, particularly in engineering and manufacturing roles, as demand for defense products surged.
How has the Ukraine war affected European defense procurement?
The conflict created urgency around military procurement, with countries prioritizing immediate delivery of proven systems over long-term development programs.
About the Author
