When Admiral Sarah Chen first saw the electromagnetic railgun fire during sea trials last month, she couldn’t help but think of her grandfather’s stories about watching the USS Missouri’s massive guns thunder across the Pacific in 1945. The sound was different—a sharp crack instead of a rolling boom—but the sheer power was unmistakable.
“It’s like watching science fiction become reality,” Chen told her crew as the projectile streaked toward its target at seven times the speed of sound. “But this time, it’s mounted on an American warship.”
That warship represents something the Navy hasn’t fielded in decades: a true battleship designed for modern warfare. The Trump class battleships are bringing back big guns in a big way, and General Atomics wants to make sure railguns have a place in that arsenal.
Why Railguns Are Making a Comeback on Trump Class Battleships
The U.S. Navy officially shelved its railgun program in 2021, dismissing it as too expensive and technically challenging for practical use. Most defense experts figured that was the end of electromagnetic naval weapons.
They were wrong.
As Trump class battleships moved from concept drawings to actual steel hulls, everything changed. These massive vessels—displacing over 65,000 tons and stretching nearly 900 feet—have something previous Navy ships lacked: enormous electrical power generation capacity and plenty of deck space for experimental weapons.
“The Trump class gives us a platform that can actually handle the power requirements,” explains Dr. James Patterson, a former Navy weapons researcher. “Previous destroyers and cruisers simply couldn’t generate enough electricity or accommodate the physical size of railgun systems.”
General Atomics never completely abandoned railgun technology, even when official Navy funding dried up. Company executives quietly shifted resources into related electromagnetic programs, keeping core technologies alive while waiting for the right opportunity.
That opportunity arrived when the first Trump class battleship, USS Donald Trump (BB-82), conducted initial weapons tests with a 32-megajoule railgun mounted in its forward turret position.
What Makes These Electromagnetic Weapons So Powerful
Understanding railgun technology requires thinking beyond traditional naval artillery. Instead of using gunpowder explosions to propel shells, railguns use massive electrical currents to create electromagnetic fields that accelerate metal projectiles to hypersonic speeds.
The advantages are substantial:
- Range: Projectiles can travel over 100 nautical miles with pinpoint accuracy
- Speed: Mach 7+ velocities make interception nearly impossible
- Cost: Simple metal slugs cost hundreds of dollars versus thousands for missiles
- Magazine depth: Ships can carry thousands of rounds in compact storage
- Versatility: Same system can fire different projectile types for various missions
| Weapon System | Range (nm) | Cost per Shot | Speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-inch Naval Gun | 15 | $3,000 | Mach 2.5 |
| Tomahawk Missile | 900 | $2 million | Mach 0.8 |
| 32 MJ Railgun | 100+ | $25,000 | Mach 7+ |
The Trump class battleships feature integrated electric propulsion systems capable of generating over 150 megawatts of power—more than enough to operate multiple railgun systems simultaneously while maintaining full ship operations.
“We’re not talking about replacing every weapon system,” notes General Atomics executive Nick Bucci. “But railguns give commanders options they’ve never had before, especially for precision strikes at extended range.”
Real-World Impact on Naval Warfare and Global Security
The potential deployment of railguns on Trump class battleships represents more than just new technology—it could fundamentally alter naval strategy and international maritime balance.
For the U.S. Navy, railgun-equipped battleships offer unprecedented firepower projection capabilities. A single Trump class vessel could theoretically engage multiple surface targets simultaneously while providing long-range fire support for amphibious operations or coastal bombardment missions.
International allies and adversaries are paying close attention. China has invested heavily in railgun research, while Russia has explored similar electromagnetic weapon systems for both naval and land-based applications.
“When you can deliver precision strikes at 100-mile range using projectiles that cost less than most car payments, you change the economics of naval warfare,” explains retired Admiral Michael Rodriguez, now a defense consultant.
The technology also addresses critical ammunition logistics challenges. Traditional missile-heavy ships must return to port frequently for rearmament, limiting operational tempo. Railgun projectiles are simple, dense, and can be manufactured at forward bases or even aboard ship using 3D printing technology.
However, significant challenges remain:
- Power management during sustained operations
- Barrel wear requiring frequent replacement
- Electronic interference with ship systems
- Weather sensitivity affecting accuracy
- Integration with existing fire control systems
General Atomics engineers are addressing these issues through advanced materials research and improved electrical systems design. The company has invested over $500 million in railgun development since 2015, much of it funded through internal resources and commercial partnerships.
“We’ve solved most of the fundamental physics problems,” Bucci explains. “Now it’s about engineering refinement and operational integration.”
The first operational Trump class battleship is scheduled for deployment in 2027, giving the Navy time to conduct extensive testing and crew training. Initial railgun installations will likely focus on anti-surface warfare and land attack missions, with anti-aircraft capabilities following as technology matures.
For taxpayers, railgun development represents both opportunity and risk. Success could provide American forces with decisive technological advantages while reducing long-term ammunition costs. Failure could mean billions in wasted investment on yet another “revolutionary” weapon system that never quite delivers on its promises.
The stakes extend beyond individual ships or weapon systems. As great power competition intensifies in the Pacific, electromagnetic weapons could provide crucial advantages in potential conflict scenarios—or become expensive museum pieces if technical challenges prove insurmountable.
“We’re betting that the physics works and the engineering catches up,” Rodriguez concludes. “Time will tell if that bet pays off.”
FAQs
What exactly is a railgun and how does it work?
A railgun uses powerful electromagnetic fields to accelerate metal projectiles to hypersonic speeds, similar to how a particle accelerator works but designed for warfare.
Why did the Navy cancel railgun programs in 2021?
The Navy cited high costs, technical challenges, and lack of suitable ship platforms capable of providing enough electrical power for operational systems.
How much do Trump class battleships cost to build?
Each Trump class battleship costs approximately $13 billion to construct, making them among the most expensive warships ever built.
Can railgun projectiles be intercepted by missile defense systems?
The extreme speed of railgun projectiles (Mach 7+) makes interception extremely difficult with current missile defense technology.
When will railgun-equipped battleships enter active service?
The first Trump class battleship with operational railgun systems is expected to begin deployment in 2027, pending successful completion of sea trials.
How do railgun costs compare to traditional naval weapons?
Railgun projectiles cost around $25,000 each compared to $2 million for Tomahawk missiles, offering significant long-term savings despite high initial system costs.
About the Author
