The Navy officer stood before Congress in 2017, confident and convincing. “This time will be different,” he promised, gesturing at the sleek computer renderings behind him. The new Constellation-class frigate would learn from past mistakes, deliver on time, and give America the naval power it needed. Seven years and $9 billion later, that same program has been quietly scrapped.
It’s a story that might sound familiar to anyone who’s watched a home renovation go spectacularly wrong. What starts as a simple upgrade spirals into a complete rebuild, costs multiply beyond recognition, and eventually you’re left wondering if you should have just bought a different house entirely.
Except this isn’t about kitchen cabinets. This is about America’s ability to build the warships that protect global trade routes and keep adversaries at bay while they launch new vessels on schedule.
When Redemption Becomes Another Disaster
The frigate project cancelled after burning through billions was supposed to be the Navy’s redemption story. The Constellation-class frigate, officially designated FFG-62, emerged from the wreckage of the Littoral Combat Ship program, which critics had dismissed as too fragile and overspecialized for real combat.
“We learned our lesson with LCS,” one defense analyst explained at the time. “Constellation would be different—a proven hull design with American technology.”
The plan seemed logical enough. Take a successful European frigate design, the FREMM, and adapt it with cutting-edge American radar and weapons systems. The result would combine European shipbuilding expertise with American technological superiority.
But logic and naval shipbuilding don’t always align. What looked straightforward on paper became a nightmare of integration problems, cost overruns, and schedule delays that stretched years beyond the original timeline.
The $9 Billion Question: What Went Wrong?
The numbers tell a story of ambition colliding with reality. Here’s how the frigate project cancelled after massive spending broke down:
| Original Plan (2017) | Final Reality (2024) |
|---|---|
| $950 million per ship | $1.8 billion per ship |
| First delivery: 2024 | First delivery: 2029 (projected) |
| 20 ships planned | 3 hulls under construction |
| Proven European design | 70% redesigned for US systems |
The core problems emerged early but weren’t acknowledged publicly for years:
- The EASR radar system proved incompatible with the ship’s power generation
- Aegis combat system integration required extensive hull modifications
- Weight distribution problems affected stability and performance
- Software integration between European and American systems failed repeatedly
- Supply chain disruptions inflated material costs by 40%
“Every time we solved one problem, two more appeared,” a former program manager revealed. “We were essentially building a new ship while pretending it was an existing design.”
The situation became so dire that the Navy quietly began exploring alternatives in 2023, eventually settling on a modified version of an existing destroyer design—essentially admitting that the frigate concept had failed entirely.
What This Means for America’s Naval Future
The implications stretch far beyond one cancelled program. While China has launched over 50 major warships in the past five years and European allies continue building vessels on schedule, America’s shipbuilding capacity appears increasingly unreliable.
The ripple effects are already visible across the defense industry. Shipyards that invested heavily in Constellation-specific tooling now face uncertain futures. Suppliers who ramped up production for components that will never be installed are cutting jobs and reconsidering defense contracts.
“This sends a message to our allies and adversaries alike,” warns a senior defense official. “If we can’t build a frigate based on a proven design, what can we build?”
The Navy’s replacement program, based on a modified Arleigh Burke destroyer, will be larger, more expensive, and deliver fewer ships than originally planned. Each vessel will cost approximately $2.3 billion—more than twice the original Constellation budget and approaching the cost of much larger destroyers.
For taxpayers, the frigate project cancelled represents more than just wasted money. It’s a symptom of deeper problems in how America approaches complex military projects:
- Unrealistic initial cost estimates that secure Congressional approval
- Requirements creep that transforms simple projects into technological showcases
- Insufficient oversight during critical development phases
- Reluctance to cancel failing programs before costs spiral completely out of control
The Navy now plans to operate with fewer total ships than originally intended, potentially leaving gaps in coverage that adversaries could exploit. Regional commanders who counted on additional frigates for patrol duties and convoy escort missions will have to make do with fewer, more expensive alternatives.
“We’re asking destroyers to do frigate missions,” explains a naval strategy expert. “It’s like using a Ferrari to deliver pizza—it works, but it’s incredibly wasteful.”
The cancelled frigate program also raises questions about America’s defense industrial base. If established shipyards with decades of experience can’t integrate proven technologies into existing hull designs, how will the country develop the truly revolutionary naval systems needed for future conflicts?
Perhaps most troubling is the timeline. While this frigate project cancelled after nearly a decade of development, potential adversaries have designed, built, and deployed entirely new classes of warships. The pace of American naval development increasingly appears mismatched to the speed of global threats.
The lesson isn’t necessarily that America can’t build warships—the country still produces some of the world’s most capable submarines and aircraft carriers. But the frigate failure suggests that the systems and processes used for major naval programs need fundamental reform before the next crisis requires rapid shipbuilding at scale.
FAQs
Why was the Constellation-class frigate cancelled?
The program suffered from massive cost overruns, technical integration problems, and years of delays, ultimately making it more expensive than larger destroyer alternatives.
How much money was wasted on the cancelled frigate project?
Approximately $9 billion was spent over seven years before the program was terminated, with only three incomplete hulls to show for the investment.
What will replace the Constellation-class frigate?
The Navy is developing a modified destroyer design that will be larger and more expensive but hopefully more reliable than the failed frigate program.
How does this compare to other countries’ naval programs?
While China and European allies have successfully launched dozens of new warships on schedule, the US Navy has struggled with multiple program failures and delays in recent years.
Could this affect America’s naval capabilities?
Yes, the cancelled program means fewer total ships available for missions, potentially creating coverage gaps that commanders will need to address with existing vessels.
What lessons can be learned from this failure?
The frigate cancellation highlights problems with unrealistic cost estimates, insufficient oversight, and the challenges of integrating complex military technologies into existing designs.
About the Author
