Sarah Chen watched her laptop screen in disbelief, her coffee growing cold as she stared at the ice dancing scores from Milan. Like millions of Americans, she’d stayed up until 3 AM to watch Madison Chock and Evan Bates glide across the ice with what looked like perfection. Their “Paint It Black” routine had given her chills – the kind that make you forget you’re watching a screen instead of being rinkside.
When the scores flashed across her screen, Sarah felt that familiar sting of injustice that every sports fan knows. Silver medal. Second place. Despite what looked like the performance of their lives.
Now, days later, the internet is buzzing with something far more serious than typical post-competition disappointment. USA ice dancers are demanding judge vetting after suspicious scoring patterns emerged, and what started as heartbreak is turning into a full-blown controversy that could reshape Olympic figure skating forever.
When Perfect Isn’t Enough: The Milan Controversy Unfolds
Madison Chock and Evan Bates delivered what most experts called a flawless performance in Milan. Their choreography to “Paint It Black” went viral within hours, with clips racking up millions of views across social media platforms. Yet they found themselves holding silver medals while France’s Laurence Fournier Beaudry and Guillaume Cizeron took gold.
The margin was razor-thin: just 1.43 points separated the teams. But here’s where things get interesting – and infuriating for American fans.
French judge Jezabel Dabouis awarded her home country 137.45 points while giving Team USA only 129.74 points. She was the only judge to score the American duo below 130 points, creating a scoring anomaly that’s now under intense scrutiny.
“The pattern of scoring was so obvious that even casual viewers started questioning it,” says former Olympic judge Rebecca Martinez. “When one judge’s scores are consistently outliers favoring their home country, that raises red flags.”
Breaking Down the Suspicious Scoring Patterns
The numbers tell a story that’s hard to ignore. Here’s how the judging broke down across both segments of the competition:
| Judge Nationality | Score Given to USA | Score Given to France | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 137.67 | 133.12 | +4.55 USA |
| China | 136.95 | 135.88 | +1.07 USA |
| France (Dabouis) | 129.74 | 137.45 | +7.71 France |
| Canada | 135.23 | 134.67 | +0.56 USA |
The pattern becomes even more concerning when looking at the rhythm dance segment:
- Dabouis gave France their highest score of 93.34 points
- She awarded USA their second-lowest score of 87.6 points
- The 5.74-point gap was significantly larger than other judges’ assessments
- Most other judges scored the teams within 2-3 points of each other
“These aren’t minor discrepancies,” explains skating analyst Tom Richardson. “When one judge consistently scores 5-7 points differently than their colleagues, especially favoring their home country, it suggests either incompetence or bias.”
Why This Matters Beyond One Medal
The controversy extends far beyond Chock and Bates’ silver medal disappointment. The USA ice dancers judge vetting demands could fundamentally change how Olympic skating competitions operate.
Current International Skating Union (ISU) rules allow judges from competing nations to score their own teams. While there are systems in place to identify outlier scores, they don’t prevent potentially biased judging from affecting final results.
Chock and Bates aren’t staying quiet about the situation. In post-competition interviews, they’ve called for comprehensive judge vetting processes that would include:
- Psychological evaluations to assess bias tendencies
- Mandatory recusal when judging home country athletes
- Real-time score monitoring with automatic outlier flagging
- Transparent post-competition score reviews
- Standardized training programs for all international judges
“We’re not just fighting for our own medal,” Bates said in a recent interview. “We’re fighting for every future athlete who deserves fair judging.”
The Ripple Effects Across Figure Skating
This controversy is sending shockwaves through the figure skating community. Other countries are now reviewing their own judging experiences, and patterns of questionable scoring are emerging from previous competitions.
The immediate impact includes:
- Calls for the ISU to investigate the Milan judging panel
- Potential rule changes for judge nationality restrictions
- Increased scrutiny of all international skating competitions
- Growing support for automated scoring systems
But the long-term consequences could be even more significant. If judge vetting becomes mandatory, it might restore faith in competitive figure skating at a time when viewership has been declining.
“Fans invest emotionally in these competitions,” says sports psychologist Dr. Amanda Foster. “When they perceive unfairness, they don’t just get angry – they stop watching altogether.”
What Happens Next for Olympic Judging
The ISU faces mounting pressure to address these concerns before the next major international competition. Several countries have already submitted formal complaints about the Milan judging, and USA ice dancers judge vetting proposals are gaining international support.
Potential reforms being discussed include:
- Anonymous judging systems where scores can’t be traced to specific countries
- Expanded judge pools with mandatory rotation policies
- AI-assisted scoring to identify technical elements objectively
- Public release of detailed scoring breakdowns within 24 hours
For Chock and Bates, the fight continues beyond their skating careers. They’ve announced plans to work with the U.S. Figure Skating Association to develop comprehensive judging reform proposals.
“Our silver medal will always have an asterisk in our minds,” Chock admits. “But if we can prevent this from happening to future athletes, that’s worth fighting for.”
The skating world is watching closely as this controversy unfolds. What started as questions about one judge’s scoring could ultimately transform how Olympic figure skating maintains fairness and integrity in competition.
FAQs
What exactly are USA ice dancers demanding regarding judge vetting?
Madison Chock and Evan Bates want comprehensive background checks, bias assessments, and mandatory training for all international judges, plus rules preventing judges from scoring their home countries.
How much did the French judge’s scoring affect the final results?
The French judge’s outlier scores potentially cost Team USA the gold medal, as she consistently scored them 5-7 points lower than other judges while giving France significantly higher marks.
Can the Milan ice dancing results be changed?
While formal complaints have been filed, overturning Olympic results is extremely rare and would require proof of rule violations or misconduct, not just questionable scoring patterns.
Are there currently any rules about judges scoring their own countries?
Current ISU rules allow judges to score their home countries, though there are systems to identify statistical outliers after the fact.
What other countries support judge vetting reforms?
Several countries including Canada, Japan, and Germany have expressed support for stricter judging oversight following the Milan controversy.
How common are judging controversies in figure skating?
Judging controversies occur regularly in figure skating, with major incidents happening at nearly every Olympics since the sport began using subjective scoring systems.
About the Author
